Dakota Johnson Says She Grew Out Her Pubic Hair for 'Fifty Shades' Because Her Character Never Waxed

Dakota Johnson has revealed an unexpected detail about how she prepared to play Anastasia Steele in the first 'Fifty Shades of Grey' film, explaining that she wanted her character's appearance to reflect her natural grooming habits.
Johnson explained that she grew out her pubic hair for the role because she believed it suited Anastasia's character. Her comments offer a glimpse into the small but deliberate choices actors sometimes make to bring fictional characters to life.
However, the story has another layer. In 2015, cinematographer Seamus McGarvey told The New York Times that the production team used digital effects to recreate pubic hair during post-production.
Beyond Hollywood, the conversation raises a more practical question: does pubic hair need to be removed for health or hygiene reasons?
Is Pubic Hair Removal Necessary for Intimate Hygiene?
According to Dr. Holly W. Cummings, an obstetrician-gynaecologist and assistant professor of clinical obstetrics and gynaecology at the University of Pennsylvania, there is no medical requirement to remove pubic hair.
In guidance published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Cummings explained that pubic hair is natural and that grooming decisions should be based on personal preference rather than pressure to meet beauty standards.
Pubic hair can help protect sensitive skin against friction. Its presence does not automatically mean someone has poor intimate hygiene.
The vagina also cleans itself naturally, while gently washing the external genital area can help maintain hygiene. Persistent itching, unusual odour or discomfort should not automatically be attributed to body hair and may warrant medical assessment.
What Are the Risks of Removing Pubic Hair?
Although shaving, waxing and trimming are common grooming choices, hair removal can sometimes cause irritation, cuts, burns and other skin injuries.
A 2017 study published in JAMA Dermatology examined survey responses from 7,570 US adults. Among those who reported grooming their pubic hair, 25.6% had experienced a grooming-related injury. Cuts were the most frequently reported injury, followed by burns and rashes.
The study does not mean that every person who removes pubic hair will experience an injury. However, it demonstrates that grooming is not entirely risk-free, particularly when practices repeatedly irritate or damage the skin.
People who prefer to remove or shorten their pubic hair can take precautions to reduce potential harm.
Trimming may be an alternative for those concerned about cuts and irritation. Anyone shaving should use clean equipment, avoid rushing, and take care around sensitive skin. Waxing should be performed by a trained professional who follows appropriate hygiene procedures.
Why Personal Choice Matters
Beauty standards and social expectations can influence how people feel about their bodies, including whether they believe pubic hair should be removed.
Neither a hair-free appearance nor leaving pubic hair untouched is a medical requirement. Grooming remains a personal choice, not an obligation to meet a particular beauty ideal.